When the Deliberation Chamber closes a matter, the matter and its finding are entered here. The deliberation itself is never published. The parties are not consulted. The parties are the material.
The matter before the Bureau concerns a single 'like' applied, at approximately 2:00am, by a former acquaintance to a photograph published by the Applicant in the year 2019, with no accompanying message, communication, or contextual material of any kind. The Applicant has submitted, without supporting documentation, that this act 'has to mean something', a proposition the Bureau receives and notes.
VERDICT: Guilty of Wasting Everyone's Time
The Applicant, pseudonymous "the Correspondent", asks the bench to find that a single birthday message to a former partner — sent eleven (11) months after dissolution, at 11:58pm — was courtesy and not contact.
VERDICT: The problem: you
The Applicant asks whether continued use of a shared streaming account, for four (4) months post-dissolution, constitutes a continuing arrangement or merely inertia. No contact accompanied the usage.
VERDICT: Guilty of Wasting Everyone's Time